Free JN0-690 Questions for Juniper Junos Troubleshooting JN0-690 Exam as PDF & Practice Test Engine
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
user@R1> show configuration interfaces lo0
unit 5 {
family inet {
filter {
input JUNOS;
}
address 5.5.5.5/32;
}
}
user@R1> show configuration firewall family inet filter JUNOS
term term1 {
from {
protocol tcp;
port [ telnet ftp ftp-data snmp ssh syslog http tacacs 64644 1024-65535 ];
}
then {
log;
accept;
}
}
term default {
then {
discard;
} } -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which three statements are true? (Choose three.)
-- Exhibit --
user@R1> show configuration interfaces lo0
unit 5 {
family inet {
filter {
input JUNOS;
}
address 5.5.5.5/32;
}
}
user@R1> show configuration firewall family inet filter JUNOS
term term1 {
from {
protocol tcp;
port [ telnet ftp ftp-data snmp ssh syslog http tacacs 64644 1024-65535 ];
}
then {
log;
accept;
}
}
term default {
then {
discard;
} } -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which three statements are true? (Choose three.)
Correct Answer: B,C,D
Vote an answer
Which CLI command is used to restart a software process?
Correct Answer: D
Vote an answer
Explanation: Only visible for ExamDiscuss members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Two neighboring routers running OSPF were configured with the same router ID by mistake.
Which OSPF operational mode command would report the number of hello packets received with the local router's router ID?
Which OSPF operational mode command would report the number of hello packets received with the local router's router ID?
Correct Answer: D
Vote an answer
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
user@router> show configuration system services | display inheritance
ssh;
telnet;
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit -
user@router> show configuration system services | display inheritance
ssh;
telnet;
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,C
Vote an answer
-- Exhibit --
Local traffic capture on r1:
Address resolution is OFF.
Listening on ge-5/3/0.0, capture size 1514 bytes
22:16:33.610374 Out IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 34562, offset 0, flags [none], proto: OSPF (89), length:
76) 10.1.2.1 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 56 [len 44]
Router-ID 1.1.1.1, Backbone Area, Authentication TypE. none (0)
Options [External, LLS]
Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 128
LLS: checksum: 0xfff6, length: 3
Extended Options (1), length: 4
Options: 0x00000001 [LSDB resync]
[edit]
user@r1# run show ospf interface
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs
ge-5/3/0.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0
lo0.1 DR 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 0
[edit]
user@r1# run show ospf neighbor
Local traffic capture on r2:
Address resolution is OFF.
Listening on ge-5/3/1.0, capture size 1514 bytes
22:16:42.238030 Out IP6 (class 0xc0, hlim 1, next-header: OSPF (89), length: 36)
fe80::6687:88ff:fe6c:6769 > ff02::5: OSPFv3, Hello, length 36
Router-ID 2.2.2.2, Backbone Area
Options [V6, External, Router]
Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Interface-ID 0.0.0.1, Priority 128
Neighbor List:
user@r2# run show ospf interface OSPF instance is not running -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, routers r1 and r2 are connected to each other by interfaces ge-5/3/0 and ge-5/3/1 respectively. They do not become OSPF neighbors.
Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Local traffic capture on r1:
Address resolution is OFF.
Listening on ge-5/3/0.0, capture size 1514 bytes
22:16:33.610374 Out IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 34562, offset 0, flags [none], proto: OSPF (89), length:
76) 10.1.2.1 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 56 [len 44]
Router-ID 1.1.1.1, Backbone Area, Authentication TypE. none (0)
Options [External, LLS]
Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 128
LLS: checksum: 0xfff6, length: 3
Extended Options (1), length: 4
Options: 0x00000001 [LSDB resync]
[edit]
user@r1# run show ospf interface
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs
ge-5/3/0.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0
lo0.1 DR 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 0
[edit]
user@r1# run show ospf neighbor
Local traffic capture on r2:
Address resolution is OFF.
Listening on ge-5/3/1.0, capture size 1514 bytes
22:16:42.238030 Out IP6 (class 0xc0, hlim 1, next-header: OSPF (89), length: 36)
fe80::6687:88ff:fe6c:6769 > ff02::5: OSPFv3, Hello, length 36
Router-ID 2.2.2.2, Backbone Area
Options [V6, External, Router]
Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Interface-ID 0.0.0.1, Priority 128
Neighbor List:
user@r2# run show ospf interface OSPF instance is not running -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, routers r1 and r2 are connected to each other by interfaces ge-5/3/0 and ge-5/3/1 respectively. They do not become OSPF neighbors.
Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,D
Vote an answer
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -user@router> show snmp statistics
SNMP statistics: Input: Packets: 246213, Bad versions: 12, Bad community names: 12, Bad community uses: 0, ASN parse errors: 0, Too bigs: 0, No such names: 0, Bad values: 0, Read onlys: 0, General errors: 0,
Total request varbinds: 227084, Total set varbinds: 67,
Get requests: 44942, Get nexts: 1 , Set requests: 10712,
Get responses: 0, Traps: 0,
Silent drops: 0, Proxy drops: 0, Commit pending drops: 0,
Throttle drops: 0,
V3 Input:
Unknown security models: 0, Invalid messages: 0
Unknown pdu handlers: 0, Unavailable contexts: 0
Unknown contexts: 0, Unsupported security levels: 0
Not in time windows: 0, Unknown user names: 0
Unknown engine ids: 0, Wrong digests: 0, Decryption errors: 0
Output:
Packets: 246093, Too bigs: 0, No such names: 0,
Bad values: 0, General errors: 0,
Get requests: 0, Get nexts: 0, Set requests: 0,
Get responses: 246025, Traps: 0
-- Exhibit --
A new SNMP session has recently been implemented on this router and is experiencing problems sending and receiving SNMP information.
Referring to the exhibit, which two problems are indicated by the received messages from the NMS? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit -user@router> show snmp statistics
SNMP statistics: Input: Packets: 246213, Bad versions: 12, Bad community names: 12, Bad community uses: 0, ASN parse errors: 0, Too bigs: 0, No such names: 0, Bad values: 0, Read onlys: 0, General errors: 0,
Total request varbinds: 227084, Total set varbinds: 67,
Get requests: 44942, Get nexts: 1 , Set requests: 10712,
Get responses: 0, Traps: 0,
Silent drops: 0, Proxy drops: 0, Commit pending drops: 0,
Throttle drops: 0,
V3 Input:
Unknown security models: 0, Invalid messages: 0
Unknown pdu handlers: 0, Unavailable contexts: 0
Unknown contexts: 0, Unsupported security levels: 0
Not in time windows: 0, Unknown user names: 0
Unknown engine ids: 0, Wrong digests: 0, Decryption errors: 0
Output:
Packets: 246093, Too bigs: 0, No such names: 0,
Bad values: 0, General errors: 0,
Get requests: 0, Get nexts: 0, Set requests: 0,
Get responses: 246025, Traps: 0
-- Exhibit --
A new SNMP session has recently been implemented on this router and is experiencing problems sending and receiving SNMP information.
Referring to the exhibit, which two problems are indicated by the received messages from the NMS? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B,D
Vote an answer
An interface on your Junos device reports a device-level flag of Loopback-detected.
What is causing this flag to be reported?
What is causing this flag to be reported?
Correct Answer: D
Vote an answer
0
0
0
10
