Free 301b Questions for F5 LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot 301b Exam as PDF & Practice Test Engine

An LTM Specialist uploaded new releases .iso and .md5 files titled "BIGIP-FILENAME" via the GUI.
Which commands are run via the command line from the root directory to verify the integrity of the new .iso file?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
A virtual server is set up on an LTM device as follows:
Virtual server address 78.24.213.79
Default Persistence ProfilE.source_addr, 600s.
Pool NamE.Pool1
Pool Members: 10.72.250.52:80 and 10.72.250.60:80 (both on Internal Vlan)
There are several current connections to the virtual server, and pool member
10.72.250.52:80 has been set to a "Disabled" state.
A tcpdump on the Internal Vlan shows traffic going to 10.72.250.52:80.
How soon after the persistence table query was run can existing connections be
refreshed/renewed to ensure that no requests are sent to 10.72.250.52?

An LTM device supports two power supplies. The value of the BigDB key "platform.powersupplymonitor" is equal to enable.
Where would the error message be visible if one of the power supplies fails or is NOT plugged in?

An LTM Specialist has a single HTTPS virtual server doing SSL termination. No server SSL profile is defined. The pool members are on the internal VLAN answering on HTTP port 80. Users with certain browsers are experiencing issues.
Which two locations are most appropriate to gather packets needed to determine the SSL issue? (Choose two.)

A web application requires the client to provide the destination server and service identification.
Which HTTP header will supply this information?

An LTM Specialist configures an HTTP monitor as follows:
ltm monitor http stats_http_monitor {
defaults-from http
destination *:*
interval 5
recv "Health check: OK"
send "GET /stats/stats.html HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: www.example.com\\r\\nAccept-
EncodinG.gzip, deflate\\r\\nConnection: close\\r\\n\\r\\n"
time-until-up 0 timeout 16 }
The monitor is marking all nodes as down. A trace of the HTTP conversation shows the following:
GET /stats/stats.html HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Accept-EncodinG.gzip, deflate Connection: close
HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required DatE.Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:38:56 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) WWW-AuthenticatE.Basic realm="Please enter your credentials" Content-LengtH.480 Connection: close Content-TypE.text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Which action will resolve the problem?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is performing an HTTP trace on the client side of the LTM device and notices there are many undesired headers being sent by the server in the response. The LTM Specialist wants to remove all response headers except "Set-Cookie" and "Location."
How should the LTM Specialist modify the HTTP profile to remove undesired headers from the HTTP response?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the output of the tmsh interface show command, what is the issue?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
Users receive an error when attempting to connect to the website https://website.com. The website has a DNS record of 195.56.67.90. The upstream ISP has confirmed that there is nothing wrong with the routing between the user and the LTM device.
The following tcpdump outputs have been captured:
External Vlan, filtered on IP 168.210.232.5
00:25:07.598519 IP 168.210.232.5.33159 > 195.56.67.90.https: S 1920647964:1920647964(0) win 8192 <mss 1450,nop,nop,sackOK>
00:25:07.598537 IP 195.56.67.90.https > 168.210.232.5.33159: S 2690691360:2690691360(0) ack 1920647965 win 4350 <mss 1460,sackOK,eol>
00:25:07.598851 IP 168.210.232.5.33160 > 195.56.67.90.https: S 2763858764:2763858764(0) win 8192 <mss 1450,nop,nop,sackOK>
00:25:07.598858 IP 195.56.67.90.https > 168.210.232.5.33160: S 1905576176:1905576176(0) ack 2763858765 win 4350 <mss 1460,sackOK,eol>
Internal Vlan, filtered on IP 168.210.232.5
00:31:46.171124 IP 168.210.232.5.33202 > 192.168.100.20.http: S 2389057240:2389057240(0) win 4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,sackOK,eol>
What is the problem?

A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
switch [HTTP::uri] {
"/ws1/ws.jsp" {
log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"
pool JSP
}
default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"
pool NonJSP
}
}
}
However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool /WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool /WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool /ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool /WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool /ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve this?

A client (10.10.1.30) connecting to an HTTPS virtual server (10.10.1.100) with a clientssl profile is getting an SSL error.
Which options will trace this issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with a new virtual server. When connecting through the virtual server, clients receive the message "Unable to connect" in the browser, although connections directly to the pool member show the application is functioning correctly. The LTM device configuration is:
ltm virtual /Common/vs_https { destination /Common/10.10.1.110:443 ip-protocol udp mask 255.255.255.255 pool /Common/pool_https profiles { /Common/udp { } } translate-address enabled translate-port enabled vlans-disabled }
ltm pool /Common/pool_https { members { /Common/172.16.20.1:443 { address 172.16.20.1 } } }
What issue is the LTM Specialist experiencing?

An LTM Specialist receives a request to monitor the network path through a member, but NOT the member itself.
Which monitor option should the LTM Specialist enable or configure?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an HTTP monitor that is marking a pool member as down. Connecting to the pool member directly through a browser shows the application is up and functioning correctly.
ltm monitor http http_mon { defaults-from http destination *:* interval 5 recv "200 OK" send "GET /\\r\\n" time-until-up 0 timeout 16 }
What is the issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue where one LTM device in a three LTM device group is failing to synchronize after a synchronize to group command is issued. The LTM Specialist verifies there are no packet filters, port lock down, or network issues preventing the connection.
What are two reasons the synchronization group is having issues? (Choose two.)